To build an eLearning system that is in consistency with user’s needs, it helps to watch the latest trends and developments. This is especially true for all developments on the p2p front, as file sharing behaviour is a good indicator for what users want. Now, don’t get me wrong - this does not necessarily mean that this is also exactly what they will get - but it helps. The acceptance of a given system - not only “forced” usage - directly affects the time and effort going into it by it’s users - and that is the difference between an empty system with educators being the only ones providing content (except through “forced” cooperation by students) and a living community…
This said, the latest developments in the endless PirateBay saga again show, how an idea or behaviour, once accepted by the majority, will be continued even if the original impulse is no longer there. Similar to the Napster case, derivate providers take up seamlessly where PirateBay left off. The only effect is to drive the providers underground and make it more difficult to get out of this vicious circle.
For those, who did not follow the case, here the short version: after the verdict, which will be appealed, Global Gaming Factory X bought the domain. Since then, more and more torents are copied over to the three new incarnations: OpenBitTorrent (OBT), PublicBitTorrent (PBT) and finally TheHiddenTracker (THT), which uses Anonymizers to protect the developers and users from further legal claims (see Telepolis for further details). This leaves the crusaders from the RIA and MPAA empty-handed while the transition is nearly complete.
So it is not useful to build up eLearning Systems which leave user’s needs out and force them to build up their own websites for digitalization, ressource sharing and so on outside of the eLearning system - a total waste on both sides. If the system would be flexible, allow for privacy and some flexibility, would be at least part-open and trying to aid users (e.g. backup of their social web data, publications, FAQs, assignment readers etc), this could change. A prerequisite would be, that the access to the data is guaranteed for any student for life…
So why is this happening? One of the main reasons why this is happening is the distrust of students for their own institutions. The collaboration of institutions with law enforcement without even trying to protect it’s users - e.g. by providing self-hosted mailboxes (whose user data is much better protected) or choose not to save traffic data in logs (as some providers in the nordic countries choose to do) makes collaboration difficult and hampers the will to participate which is necessary for any system to flourish.
So, a new approach would be wise - at least that’s what I think. Comments welcome.